Wednesday, 26 October 2011

Do you think when Obama addressed the mainly secular nations about Climate change he should have mentioned God?

Do you think when Obama addressed the mainly secular nations about Climate change he should have mentioned Go?

He said that (along with the USA and India) Europe and China should look after the world %26quot;that God created%26quot;.

That just seems a little stupid to me. I mean he had a good point, but a straw-man argument.Do you think when Obama addressed the mainly secular nations about Climate change he should have mentioned God?Why?

God has nothing to do with it.
Do you think when Obama addressed the mainly secular nations about Climate change he should have mentioned God?
Who cares if he mentions God.... it doesnt change the policies nor the effectiveness of such policies...



it makes no difference to his argument
Do you think when Obama addressed the mainly secular nations about Climate change he should have mentioned God?
I don't really think it matters since the secular nations, view him as being secular anyway. when you kind of think about it and his policies and his beliefs, ya might just go ahead and say he is secular.
Obama couldn't give 2 f*cks about global warming because like me, he knows it isn't man made.



He is too busy trying to set up your demise to care about climate change.
He probably should have mentioned Satan.



Whereas Bush threw money down the rat hole over war in Iraq due to the imaginary WMD's, Obama will now throw money down the rat hole over the imaginary man-made global warming. Hold on to your hat. This will be a bigger expense.
%26quot;The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.%26quot;

-United States Constitution, Article VI, section 3



%26quot;As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.%26quot;

-Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11



No.
Did he said that? God doesn't exist except in the imagination of the Bible writers! It is like attributing any event to Donald Duck!
It makes him look like a fool.
That's his opinion. It doesn't change the fact that we should look after this world. If he had said, %26quot;Europe and China should look after this %26quot;beautiful%26quot; world%26quot;, would it have been improper to use the word beautiful on the basis that some people might think it's not a beautiful world. The same holds true for mentioning God. Whether the people listening believe that God created the world, or not doesn't change the meaning of the message.
We are living in the end times and Obama clearly knows this...so why should he not mention God....x
Those people who don't believe in global warming are just ridiculous seeing as there is actual, undeniable proof that it is correct. Something religious believers aren't too familiar with.



He shouldn't have mentioned God, it disgusts me that a leader of a powerful country has to display religious beliefs to be respected by its people.